<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Reviews Archives - John Richards</title>
	<atom:link href="https://jrfilms.com/category/reviews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://jrfilms.com/category/reviews/</link>
	<description>Feature Film and TV Editor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2021 16:04:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Plots with a View &#8211; Hollywood Reporter</title>
		<link>https://jrfilms.com/2011/12/03/plots-with-a-view-hollywood-reporter/</link>
					<comments>https://jrfilms.com/2011/12/03/plots-with-a-view-hollywood-reporter/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Richards]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 19:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jrfilms.com/?p=757</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The post <a href="https://jrfilms.com/2011/12/03/plots-with-a-view-hollywood-reporter/">Plots with a View &#8211; Hollywood Reporter</a> appeared first on <a href="https://jrfilms.com">John Richards</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div class="et_pb_section et_pb_section_1 et_pb_fullwidth_section et_section_regular" >
				
				
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_fullwidth_post_title_0 et_pb_post_title  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light et_pb_image_below"   >
				
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_title_container">
					<h1 class="entry-title">Plots with a View &#8211; Hollywood Reporter</h1>
				</div>
				
			</div>
				
				
			</div><div class="et_pb_section et_pb_section_2 et_pb_with_background et_section_regular" >
				
				
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_0">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_0  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_0  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><h2></h2>
<h4>Plots with a view &#8211; Hollywood Reporter</h4>
<p><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-762" title="Plots HR1" src="https://jrfilms.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Plots-HR1-300x232.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="232" srcset="https://jrfilms.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Plots-HR1-300x232.jpg 300w, https://jrfilms.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Plots-HR1-1024x792.jpg 1024w, https://jrfilms.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Plots-HR1-449x348.jpg 449w, https://jrfilms.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Plots-HR1-688x532.jpg 688w, https://jrfilms.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Plots-HR1.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></p>
<h4><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">The Bottom Line. By Duane Byrge.</span></strong></h4>
<p><strong>Both warm and bilious, this scrumptiously daffy comedy is a deliciously dark, frothy amusement.</strong></p>
<p>Funerals have a way of bringing people together, and in this  balmy case, it&#8217;s romance. A dr, comedy backdropped by the crazed competition between to Welsh funeral homes, this Miramax film might be aptly titled &#8220;Four Funerals and a Wedding&#8221;. The variation on that hit&#8217;s title augurs where &#8220;Plots with a View&#8221; is headed at the box office, ascending to the beneficent word-of-mouth heights.</p>
<p>As one of the competing funeral directors, Christopher Walken&#8217;s performance is the most peculiar hilarity since Liberace played a casket salesman in &#8220;The Loved One&#8221;, Evelyn Waugh&#8217;s acidic take-off on Los Angeles and pet cemeteries. Walken wil surely walk off with awards-season accolades for his screwy interpretation.</p>
<p>Both warm and billious, &#8220;Plots&#8221; centers on a second romance as funeral director Boris Plotz (Alfred Molina) somberly prepares the funeral for the aunt of a well-heeled local woman, Betty (Brenda Blethyn). Boris gives it his most reverential treatment, particularly since way back when he had a yen for Betty but was too awkward to ever ask her for a dance.</p>
<p>The issue has been gnawing at Boris for nearly 30 years and, together with the fact that he alway fancied being a dancer rather than going into the family funeral business, he finally declares his love.</p>
<p>Boris and Betty plot to run away together, only for their plan to be subsumed by Boris&#8217; business pressures. A new rival funeral director, Frank Featherbed (Christopher Walken), has has decided that traditional funerals are too stodgy, and he is determined to add some pep to the staid undertaking business by staging innovative &#8220;theme funerals&#8221;. In essence, imagine that Robert Evans has decided at one time to produce funerals instead of movies.</p>
<p>Blending Boris and Betty&#8217;s blossoming romance with the tribulations of funeral home maketing techniques, screenwriter Frederick Ponzlov has concocted a deliciously dark and frothy amusement. He laces the over-the-top funeral productions smartly within the romantic story line _ Frank serves up a &#8220;Star Trek&#8221; style sendoff for an otherwise forgetable local dowager, etc. The story line is both warm and daffy, and director Nick Hurran mixes it with the right portions of perfume and acid.</p>
<p>The performances are, err, dead right. Blethyn is winningly sympathetic as a woman who didnt marry foir love, while Molina&#8217;s performance smartly embodies a repressed man&#8217;s inner romantic notions. With his poofed hair, vanity shades and Hollywood style swagger, Walken is marvelous as the P.T. Barnum like funeral director.</p>
<p>Technical contributions are perfectly shaded, from the darkest of comedic blacks to the most inspiring of romantic whites.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div>
				
				
			</div></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://jrfilms.com/2011/12/03/plots-with-a-view-hollywood-reporter/">Plots with a View &#8211; Hollywood Reporter</a> appeared first on <a href="https://jrfilms.com">John Richards</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://jrfilms.com/2011/12/03/plots-with-a-view-hollywood-reporter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Virtual Sexuality &#8211; Variety</title>
		<link>https://jrfilms.com/2011/12/03/virtual-sexuality-variety/</link>
					<comments>https://jrfilms.com/2011/12/03/virtual-sexuality-variety/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Richards]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 19:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jrfilms.com/?p=769</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The post <a href="https://jrfilms.com/2011/12/03/virtual-sexuality-variety/">Virtual Sexuality &#8211; Variety</a> appeared first on <a href="https://jrfilms.com">John Richards</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div class="et_pb_section et_pb_section_4 et_pb_fullwidth_section et_section_regular" >
				
				
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_fullwidth_post_title_1 et_pb_post_title  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light et_pb_image_below"   >
				
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_title_container">
					<h1 class="entry-title">Virtual Sexuality &#8211; Variety</h1>
				</div>
				
			</div>
				
				
			</div><div class="et_pb_section et_pb_section_5 et_pb_with_background et_section_regular" >
				
				
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_1">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_1  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_1  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner">Virtual Sexuality -By Derek Elley</p>
<p><a href="https://jrfilms.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/VS-Variety-Review.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-768" title="VS Variety Review" src="https://jrfilms.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/VS-Variety-Review-232x300.jpg" alt="" width="232" height="300" srcset="https://jrfilms.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/VS-Variety-Review-232x300.jpg 232w, https://jrfilms.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/VS-Variety-Review-795x1024.jpg 795w, https://jrfilms.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/VS-Variety-Review-270x348.jpg 270w, https://jrfilms.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/VS-Variety-Review-688x886.jpg 688w, https://jrfilms.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/VS-Variety-Review.jpg 1000w" sizes="(max-width: 232px) 100vw, 232px" /></a>Bright eyed and self-confident, down to its short skirts and tousled leisurewear, &#8220;Virtual Sexuality&#8221; ia a Brit chick-flick with attitude. Aimed at a microscopic slice of the local population (female, mid-teens), and likely to make anyone beyond that feel more than their years, pic about a lovelorn girl&#8217;s disastrous attempt to create the man of her dreams does what it sets out to do quite well and then gets off the screen. Theatrical chances look likewise brief, with a sexy life on ancillary.</p>
<p>Movie is a brave attempt to create ultra-niche youth product off the current upswing in UK production, reversing the usual Euro attitude of making a movie whether there&#8217;s an audience or not. Results so far are promising but not breakthrough: Opening July 2, against heavy competition from fine weather and Wimbledon tennis, pic raked in $400,000 of 199 screens in its first weekend, solid enough for a modest, no-name item but below expectations.</p>
<p>Justine (Laura Fraser) is a 17 year old Notting Hill virgin who&#8217;s ready to get shagged. Bemoaning the absence of bar codes on men, which would make the whole matching process easier, she enlists the advice of her knowledgeable black &#8220;soulsister,&#8221; Fran (Marcelle Duprey), and nerdy friend Chas (Luke de Lacey), in her attempt to charm school stud Alex (Kieran O&#8217;Brien).</p>
<p>When Alex bails to spend time with the appropriatly named blond siren Hoover (Natasha Bell), Justine ends up at a virtual-reality computer exhibition with Chas. Lured by its inventors into a makeover machine called Narcissus, Justine has so much fun creating her ideal self onscreen that, on a whim, she starts creating her ideal man.</p>
<p>When the power supply in the exhibition hall short-circuits and Narcissus blows up, a blond male hunk, Jake (Rupert Penry-Jones), steps out of the ruinsin Justines clothes, claiming to be her. Several reverse &#8220;switch&#8221; jokes later, the original Justine turns up, fancies her dream creation (not knowing that his personality is hers) but is still obsessed with losing her cherry to Alex. Meanwhile, Hoover zeroes in on Jake, who is then kidnapped by the Narcissus inventors for scientific tests.</p>
<p>Considering the amount of sexual confusion going on here, pic manages to keep an admirably buoyant, uncomplicated tone, settling for  the final message that Justine created an &#8220;ego extension&#8221; rather than a real, perfect guy. Beneath its mildly risque trappings and som forthright sex talk, &#8220;Virtual Sexuality&#8221; is solidly &#8217;90s conservative, with an old fashioned message.</p>
<p>Though she looks a tad old for a teen, and way too attractive fo rthe part, 23 year old Fraser, notable in a string of supporting roles from &#8220;Small Faces&#8221; to &#8220;Cousin Bette&#8221;, brings a real glow to the screen and performs with confidence.  Duprey is also good as her sassy best pal, and both help to balance the physical antics of Penry-Jones as the virtual Jake.</p>
<p>Film&#8217;s weakness is that the physical gags play much better than the verbal ones. Nick Fisher&#8217;s script, based on the far less structured novel by Cloe Rayban, is smart but not actually very funny. Still, the slick production, well edited by John Richards, largely manages to disguise or make capital out of its budget limitations, inhabits a far more real Notting Hill than the current fairy-tale pic named after the area and never remotely pretends to be anything other than what it is: a throwaway Brit pop-comic with a 90 minute shelf life.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div>
				
				
			</div></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://jrfilms.com/2011/12/03/virtual-sexuality-variety/">Virtual Sexuality &#8211; Variety</a> appeared first on <a href="https://jrfilms.com">John Richards</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://jrfilms.com/2011/12/03/virtual-sexuality-variety/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Strike Back Reviews</title>
		<link>https://jrfilms.com/2011/12/03/strike-back-reviews/</link>
					<comments>https://jrfilms.com/2011/12/03/strike-back-reviews/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Richards]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 19:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strike Back]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jrfilms.com/?p=776</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The post <a href="https://jrfilms.com/2011/12/03/strike-back-reviews/">Strike Back Reviews</a> appeared first on <a href="https://jrfilms.com">John Richards</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div class="et_pb_section et_pb_section_7 et_pb_fullwidth_section et_section_regular" >
				
				
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_fullwidth_post_title_2 et_pb_post_title  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light et_pb_image_below"   >
				
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_title_container">
					<h1 class="entry-title">Strike Back Reviews</h1>
				</div>
				
			</div>
				
				
			</div><div class="et_pb_section et_pb_section_8 et_pb_with_background et_section_regular" >
				
				
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_2">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_2  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_image et_pb_image_0">
				
				
				
				
				<span class="et_pb_image_wrap "><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="640" height="480" src="https://jrfilms.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/StrikeBack-times-square2.jpeg" alt="" title="" srcset="https://jrfilms.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/StrikeBack-times-square2.jpeg 640w, https://jrfilms.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/StrikeBack-times-square2-300x225.jpeg 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" class="wp-image-915" /></span>
			</div><div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_2  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><div>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">WASHINGTON POST:</span></strong><strong> </strong>“A vigorous sprint across a macho minefield…<strong> </strong>a surprisingly stylish and addictive new counterterrorism series…. really a study in successfully crossing a minefield of testosterone clichés, barely avoiding a “MacGyver” here and a Vin Diesel there and Guy Ritchie project over there. As the action moves to Mumbai, something about the show just clicks: It’s serious without being hammy. It’s violence without overkill. It’s hawkish without becoming jingoistic. The writing is almost entirely expository, but the acting (really, it’s the British accents) tends to gloss over that shortcoming. And it’s on Skinemax, which means the sex scenes are sweaty, ravenous and yet studiously soft-core.</p>
<div>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">NY TIMES:</span></strong> In Between the Terrorist Threats, Plenty of Time for Hanky-Panky. Cinemax — the network and the punch line — has always had a businesslike approach to original programming. Sex-businesslike, that is. “The Best Sex Ever,” “Sex Games Cancun,” “Zane’s Sex Chronicles”: its late-night offerings have made it the soft-core cathouse of premium cable. Now Cinemax has decided to join the prime-time drama game played so successfully by its parent, HBO, as well as other pay-cable networks like Showtime and Starz. In a bid to expand its young-male audience, it’s taking what it knows best (which would be sex) and adding a traditional complement, violence. Strike Back offers reasonably competent action scenes, depressingly casual depictions of torture and death, and a comic-book conspiracy story line while also being an efficient nudity delivery system. It’s the kind of show in which an agent doesn’t realize there are terrorists in the hotel lobby because he’s upstairs having it off with the waitress he met 10 minutes ago. We’re in B-movie international-thriller territory, Strike Back” won’t make anyone forget “24” or “MI-5” or even “The Unit,” but it has its pleasures for the aficionado of guns and flesh in exotic locales. There’s something satisfying in the combination of crisp British detachment and Cinemax lasciviousness. The actors give these gun-toting clichés a little personality and a credible rapport budding bromance between the two main action heroes.</p>
</div>
<p><strong> </strong><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">LA TIMES:</span></strong><strong> </strong>Cinemax&#8217;s new special ops drama shoots high with plenty of action and thrills and a simmering bromance that&#8217;s fun to watch. The continuation of a British show &#8220;Strike Back&#8221; revolves around one of those elite bands of superheroes who can hack into any security system, outshoot any paramilitary mercenary, out-talk any rogue cell member and take down a phalanx of machine gun-toting terrorists while only armed with the hotel bath towel that had previously been wrapped around their middle. The body count is high, the action relentless and all the Section 20 members shout &#8220;copy that&#8221; into their ear phones so often a viewer will be excused from wondering when Chloe is going to parachute in and offer a much needed tutorial on how to track a paneled van through really bad traffic. But it&#8217;s more methadone than madness; where &#8220;24&#8221; was the archetypal tale of the lone gunslinger operating within the grim realities of newly revamped military protocol (i.e., torture), &#8220;Strike Back&#8221; is, at its heart, a buddy movie, a simmering life-or-death bromance between its two male leads.</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">CHICAGO TRIBUNE</span></strong>: a stylish, addictive action thriller that fills a definite void in the macho spy drama genre. I just wish the 10-part series didn&#8217;t take Cinemax&#8217;s joke name—Skinemax—so much to heart. But I&#8217;ll get to that. As we approach the 10th anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, &#8220;Strike Back&#8221; brings back that desire to kick some terrorist butt—or at least it offers an escape from downer headlines. There isn’t anything too deeply intellectual here because the action moves the plot. And “Strike Back” has action to spare. And while some plot devices are familiar—hotel hostage-taking was done a couple times on the superior “MI-5”—but “Strike Back” avoids action clichés just enough to avoid being a ridiculous Steven Seagal movie. The actors ground the show as well, adding emotional heft to what could be caricatures. This being Skinemax, the creators of the show throw a whole lot of nudity and sex at viewers. I can’t believe I’m complaining about it, but the nudity here is often gratuitous to the point of being laughable. When we first meet Scott, we see his butt before his face… think we get the point that Scott’s a womanizer by the way he hits on every woman he meets; we don’t need to see a month’s worth of breasts and butt cheeks in every episode. Jack Bauer never even went to the bathroom, let alone slept around<strong>. </strong>All that unnecessary sex distracts from the important stuff, like watching these testosterone titans take down the terrorists.</p>
<p><strong> </strong><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">NEW YORK POST</span></strong>: Not for the faint of heart, the weak of stomach or the connoisseur of art, Cinemax&#8217;s original series, &#8220;Strike Back,&#8221; is, however, perfect for several people I know: the love interest and his friends. A few weekends back, these guys, armed with <em>my</em> screeners, secluded themselves indoors and watched four straight hours of &#8220;Strike Back,&#8221; coming up only long enough to grab more food and yell, &#8220;They&#8217;re really kicking ass down there!&#8221; Clearly, they weren&#8217;t fighting off terrorists in the basement with nachos, but they were so worked up, it almost seemed like it. Nothing new here…But that doesn&#8217;t mean the series doesn&#8217;t work. It&#8217;s no &#8220;MI-5,&#8221; but since Cinemax went to the Brits to make the show, it&#8217;s as good as you will get from secret agent/terrorist-hunter shows. Because it&#8217;s Brit-produced, don&#8217;t expect your favorites to last long, as the British have no problem killing off even the biggest, most-beloved characters. Good action, good characters and, besides, it&#8217;s the only show in the history of TV where the term, &#8220;f-cking pr-ck&#8221; is code</p>
<div><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"> VARIETY:</span></strong> Strip away the counterterrorism lingo and this is really just a mismatched buddy cop show, with a square-jawed Brit) thrown together with a skirt-chasing Yank special forces officer. The plots are timely &#8212; including an international hotel attack and hostage standoff &#8212; but the espionage comes across as a thinly veiled excuse to go globe-trotting through the slimy back streets where terrorists huddle. The main problem, given Cinemax&#8217;s profile, is logistical: Guys drawn to such fare are often loath to commit to series, as opposed to whatever late night sex, nudity and violence they happily stumble across. The good news is if &#8220;Strike Back&#8221; does any business at all, Cinemax can declare victory, and if the show lands with a dull thud, it&#8217;ll be easy enough for the channel to make like Section 20 and simply pretend it doesn&#8217;t exist.</div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">NY DAILY NEWS:</span></strong><strong> </strong> unapologetic, fist-pumping, nonstop action thriller with compelling good guys and loathsome bad guys…needs to be your appointment television for the next 10 weeks.&#8221;Strike Back&#8221; fills the void (action popcorn flicks) beautifully, with the added bonus of two reassuringly smart and occasionally flawed good guys.<br /> <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">HUFFINGTON POST:</span></strong><strong> </strong>Think of it as a British take on &#8220;24&#8221;&#8211;but with more sex and violence.</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">INDIE WIRE</span></strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">:</span> This juiced-up second series feels younger, less conflicted, more kung-fu acrobatic. So fast-paced it makes 24 look sluggish, and with a brighter, livelier tone that embraces both multi-cultural inclusiveness and macho backslapping….first rate pulp TV, with enough unexpected heart and authenticity to guarantee that its thrills are never cheap. A counter-terrorism action series, it probably isn’t grim or one-sided enough to be adopted by ideologues of any stripe, and it isn’t in the superhero business. Loud and fast and brightly colored, with sudden up-against-the-wall sex scenes that keep the volume turned up to eleven between the fire fights,</p>
</div></div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div>
				
				
			</div></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://jrfilms.com/2011/12/03/strike-back-reviews/">Strike Back Reviews</a> appeared first on <a href="https://jrfilms.com">John Richards</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://jrfilms.com/2011/12/03/strike-back-reviews/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
